Are Hamster Balls Good for Dwarf Hamsters? I Want the Truth!?

I prefer to never put a hamster in a ball since balls are dangerous. 1. There is not enough air circulation 2. Holes in the balls can get the feet stuck and hurt the hamster 3. No access to water if needed I would make a hamster playpen out of a storage bin so the hamster can have playtime, or he can have some place to mess around in without escaping whilst ur cleaning his cage.. I would also suggest you get him a playpen. It usually cost $12-15 where i live but it depends on your area.

1. new to golf, what equipment do i need?

Plenty of balls, tees, a small towel, ball markers, golf shoes, a hat (if you want), and a golf glove

2. I want to get a bunny, what kind of care does it need?

The cage needs to be an absolute minimum of 10.5 sq feet for one. You build it yourself and it only costs about $30. All of the materials are found locally. They need a high quality rabbit pellet, no colorful mixes, unlimited timothy hay, daily veggies and fresh water. NO SALT OR MINERAL BLOCKS! They are excess vitamins which contribute to stones and diabetes. All of their salt and minerals can be found in a healthy diet. Exercise should be letting them have free roam of a room or the house either full time or for a few hours a day. You can play with it by leaving toys around the room, hiding veggies or some will just follow you around. They do NOT use wheels or balls or leashes. Those all cause very serious injuries. They should never be housed outdoors. They also have bonded pairs that you can adopt and will be able to answer your questions in person. Do not buy from a pet shop, they are often very sick or mis-sexed. Do not buy from a breeder, rabbits are HORRIBLY overpopulated. There are thousands of rabbits homeless. Not all breeders are also responsible, so it's sometimes hard to find a reputable breeder. A rescue is by far the best place you get your rabbit.

3. In which way does quantum mechanics disprove determinism?

Determinism is the belief that if all variables are known at enough given times, then all variables can be known for all of time. This is generally true for macroscopic objects. For example, if I drop a ball from a certain height, I can predict the amount of time that elapses until the ball hits the ground. Taking this concept further, if I kick a ball of a known size and density with a measured force while knowing the velocity of wind flow, the Earth's surface gravity and air resistance, and the angle of my foot to the ball at the moment of impact, I should be able to predict the trajectory of the ball as a function of time. But things get strange in the quantum world. Rather than macroscopic objects (like balls), quantum objects are sub-atomic particles that make up the ball. Atoms consist of a nucleus (protons and neutrons) with "orbiting" electrons. The laws that govern quantum interactions are not definitive because of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, which states that the momentum (speed-dependent) and position of a particle cannot be simultaneously known with infinite precision. This means that if one knows the position of a particle, then one does not definitively know how fast it is moving; conversely, it also means that if one knows how fast a particle is moving, then it is impossible to know its position with infinite precision. This is unlike the case of a kickball. Taking this further, the total probability of an event occurring is 100% (or 1). When a particle encounters a barrier, there is a probability that the particle will not escape the barrier, but there is also a probability that the particle will penetrate through the barrier; the sum of these probabilities is one. Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr debated this topic. Einstein reckoned that if a dice-roller knew the initial positions and sizes of the dice, the temperature of the room, the sweatiness of ones palm, and any other necessary variables, then one could compute with infinite precision the outcome of the dice roll. Bohr reckoned that the subatomic world did not necessarily have to obey identical laws. I prefer to think in terms of flipping a coin. Usually, one tries to guess whether the next flip will be heads or tails assuming equal probability for each outcome. But, the heads side is slightly heavier, causing it to be a slightly more probable outcome than tails. Do you think flipping a coin is deterministic or probabilistic? Interestingly enough, probabilities of nuclear decays are computed using identical math. One thought is that quantum mechanics is deterministic (ex: Pilot-wave theory, Hidden variables, etc), and that it is imperfections in the human mind/senses and inability to measure with sufficient precision that causes it to appear as though the solutions to all quantum mechanical problems are not inherently deterministic when they actually are. However, the mainstream consensus is that quantum mechanics is inherently probabilistic. A thought experiment by Schrodinger goes something like this: a cat is trapped in a box with several attached explosives tied to a particle detector. The particle has a 50% chance of firing, in which case it is picked up by the detector and the explosives go off, killing the cat. The particle also has a 50% chance of not firing, in which case the explosives do not go off and the cat is presumably alive. If one does not check the box, how can one determine whether the cat is dead or alive? The idea is that the state of the cat exists in a "superposition of states" in which both states are possible when not being measured; however, the act of measuring by checking the box "collapses the wavefunction" into one of the two observable states. Einstein found this silly; he said that if one does not observe the Moon then one can still know definitively where it is in the night-sky. But the Moon is a macroscopic object.It gets tricky when you consider that subatomic particles firing in human brains are behind most of our actions. As a subset of the universe, humans are governed by the same laws as the universe. If the universe is deterministic, then so are humans and free will goes out the window