Is Manoj Tiwari (BJP) a Better CM Candidate Than Arvind Kejriwal (AAP) in Delhi?

They should do it! It will be the kind of political suicide Congress has been known to make off late!Movie dialogues will be worth just that!

Kejriwal has learnt his lessons in the MCD elections and has stuck to his guns, and I can assure you that I would happily like this contest to be pitched.How do people even compare these two people?Profile of Arvind Kejriwal :Education : Mechanical Engineering from IIT KharagpurBackground :Tata Steel (1989 - 1992)Volunteer for Ramakrishna Mission(NE India), while preparing for Civil Services (19921995)Indian revenue Services (19952006)In 1999 he started Parivartan with Manish SisodiaFought to bring in changes in PDS and social welfare in Delhi.

Founded Kabir with Manish Sisodia, an NGO focussing on RTI. In this time he also collaborated with the likes of Aruna Roy and Shekhar Singh to help formulate RTI.Was awarded the Ramon Magsasay Award for his work in the formation of RTI and grass-root level work.

Had protested with Anna Hazare for Jan Lokpal Bill!He currently serves a Chief Minister of Delhi. Unsuccessfully fought PM Modi for Lok Sabha seat in Varanasi, but got more than 2 Lakhs vote, far ahead of Congress!

I think you would agree that it is no small achievement. I think I do not need to continue since I would like to say something about the other luminary you wish to compare him to.Profile of Manoj Tiwari:Education : Bachelors in Sociology from BHU and Masters in Phy EdBackground :One of the most popular singers and actors of Bjojpuri Film IndustryParticipated in Big Boss.

This is something Arvind Kejriwal should have done to be in good books of BJP and Bhakts!Joined politics with Samajwadi Party! Then BJP!

Had protested with Baba Ramdev, then Ramdev escaped!He is the MP from East Delhi.His popularity amongst Bhojpuri in Delhi is immense too, but I doubt it will last since Kejriwal and his team of awesome people will trump them with actual work and not song and dance!

To conclude! To compare Kejriwal and Tiwari is like comparing apples and oranges. One has a proven record of public service other has to learn still!

I would love to see BJP thrashed once again! Congress is out of the picture anyway.

· Related Questions

What actor playing a supporting role outshone the star of the movie so much they had to make a major change?

This is a reprint of my answer to a previous question, When Did A Background Actor Steal The Show From A Main Character? My answer remains the same.My vote goes to The Pink Panther, (1963) directed by Blake Edwards.

The movies top star was the legendary David Niven, who played Sir. Charles Lytton, the glamourous and sophisticated jewel thief who stole the Pink Panther diamond. Mr.

Niven signed on to give his stalling career a jump-start, hoping to turn the movie into a vehicle for a series of sequels akin to the famous Thin Man movies. Dashing, handsome, rising young Hollywood star Robert Wagner also anticipated the movie being a vehicle for him to go on to bigger and better things, as well. Peter Ustinov was tabbed to play Inspector Clouseau, and he was cast to play it straight off Niven and Wagners clever, charming, witty hijinks.

So what happened? Peter Sellers happened.Ava Gardner was originally supposed to play the female lead, Madame Simone Clouseau, (who also happened to be Sir Charles secret accomplice, spoiler alert!

), but her behavior was considered too erratic by that time for the studio to give the go-ahead. French movie actress Capucine was asked to take over the role, with two weeks to go before production began. Mr.

Ustinovs wife thought the switch in casting wouldnt work and she advised her husband to bow out, which he did.Blake Edwards had to find another Clouseau, and fast, and a relatively unknown Peter Sellers stepped forward. And movie history was made.

Mr. SellersAlthough Mr. Niven was understandably disappointed his star vehicle launched another stars career, it didnt stop him from working alongside Mr.

Sellers in Murder by Death in 1976. Ironically, after Mr. Ustinov bowed out of The Pink Panther, he quickly found work in the movie Topkapi (1964), replacing another actor who had to bow out at the last minute because of scheduling conflicts, a fellow named Peter Sellers.

Mr. Ustinov won an Oscar for his performance.Mr.

Sellers reprised the role for four sequels. Eventually other actors took on the character of Inspector Jacques Clouseau and a total of eleven movies were made, including portrayals by Roberto Benigni, Alan Arkin, and Steve Martin. None of these portrayals came close to Sellers brilliance

------

Is it better to be pessimistic than optimistic?

If you're pessimistic, bad outcomes will be expected, but if it's good, you'll be pleasantly surprised.

I am optimistic but a radical skeptic as I described in this FREE for download book of mineNIHILISM, MINARCHISM, PYRRHONISM META-PHILOSOPHY - Living Radical ScepticismNIHILISM, MINARCHISM, PYRRHONISM META-PHILOSOPHY - Living Radical ScepticismA Meta-Philosophy exploration of immanent and non-immanent features of first-order philosophy in terms of the values of non- values or negative values of Radical Scepticism, Nihilism and Minarchy, executed to show how philosophizing is done.It misleadingly seems as if there is no progress in philosophy as, like in visual art, literature and music, each original thinker re-invents the entire discipline, its aims, purposes, values, methods,netcnThe nature of philosophical tools, methods, techniques and skills will be investigated and applied in terms of radical scepticism.

This approach, set of values and attitude restrict the nature and the style of the meta-philosophizing. It will for example prevent the traditional development of a general, all-encompassing and all-inclusive metaphysical system. It also demands the focus on context-specific investigation of questions and the dealing of a particular problem in a certain context.

These limits require the re-interpretation of any philosophical toolnbeing employed as well as the underlying assumptions and any pre-suppositions. As far as possible philosophizing as an aspect of the processes of theorizing will be adhered to and realized. In chapter THREE I illustrate many-leveled and multi-dimensional thinking, that are to me as a visual artist as well, of extreme importance.

These are the types of things employed by radical skepticism and that should be the form of philosophizing instead of and replacing traditional one-leveled and one-dimensional thinking, argumentation and reasoningPHILOSOPHY u2013 Aims, Methods, RationaleIn this meta-philosophical study I commence with an investigation of Wisdom. I then continue with an exploration of the institutionalization of the subject and the professionalization of those involved in it. This I contrast with original and creative philosophizing.

In then sows that philosophizing resembles and attempts to do theorizing. The 9 questions, etc of the Socratic Method and details of the Philosophical Toolkit occur throughout different stages of theorizing as one level and one dimension of it. Linked books are FREE for download.

n1 Seeking, development and realization of wisdom 4n2 Institutionalization, Professionalization of u2018philosophyu2019 5n3 Original and Creative Thinking Philosophizing 37n4 Philosophizing resembles Theorizingn 38n(i)tSocratic Method 41n(ii)tPhilosophical Toolkit 145

------

If you are a scientist, do you believe in a creator?

It depends on what level theyre at professionally.If youre talking about elite scientists like Neil deGrasse Tyson, Stephen Hawking, and Carl Sagan, well over 90% are atheists.

There are, of course, outliers like Francis Collins, an evangelical Christian who was head of the Human Genome Project and is currently Director of the National Institutes of Health. However, scientists as a whole are far less likely to believe in a deity than non-scientists, according to The Pew Research Center:According to the poll, just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power; specifically, 33% of scientists say they believe in God, while 18% believe in a universal spirit or higher power. By contrast, 95% of Americans believe in some form of deity or higher power, according to a survey of the general public conducted by the Pew Research Center in July 2006.

Specifically, more than eight-in-ten Americans (83%) say they believe in God and 12% believe in a universal spirit or higher power. Finally, the poll of scientists finds that four-in-ten scientists (41%) say they do not believe in God or a higher power, while the poll of the public finds that only 4% of Americans share this view.Given their much lower levels of belief in God or a higher power, it is not surprising that the percentage of scientists who are unaffiliated with any religion is much higher than among the general public.

Nearly half of all scientists in the 2009 Pew Research Center poll (48%) say they have no religious affiliation (meaning they describe themselves as atheist, agnostic or nothing in particular), compared with only 17% of the public. Thus, it follows that most faith traditions are represented in smaller numbers in the scientific community than in the public as a whole. For instance, the scientific community is far less Protestant (21%) and Catholic (10%) than the general public, which is 51% Protestant and 24% Catholic.

And while evangelical Protestants make up more than a fourth of the general population (28%), they make up only a small slice (4%) of the scientific community. One notable exception is Jews bold mine, who make up a larger proportion of the scientific community (8%) than the general population (2%).Scientists and BeliefNote that this was a 2009 poll, and in the intervening ten years, approximately 16% (some studies say more) of Americans claim to be atheists

------

Why do many people hate MS Dhoni?

Is he overrated?

M S Dhoni. The man who has brought laurels upon laurels for the country.

At what cost ?By lying to the nation to save his Boss Srinivasan ?Harish Salve's salvo: MS Dhoni answerable for lying to Mudgal panelThis is an offence which probably carries a jail-term - Lying to a Supreme Court appointed panel.

Dhoni wasand continues to bea vice-president in India Cements. A company, which gained considerably from the lie, back then.2.

Choosing players from the player management company in which he held shares and increasing their grades / contract values.Ex-cricketers blast Dhoni over Rhiti Sports3. Not giving a chance to a player for 14 consecutive matches immediately after he scored a match-winning century and finishing his morale.

IPL 2019 Auction: Manoj Tiwary takes a dig at BCCI, franchises after going unsoldInstead - he persisted with the likes of Raina whose capabilities with the willow are still suspect even today.4. Removing Gambhir (our top scorer in both 07 and 11 WC finals) from the team conveniently when he was being touted as the best candidate for a Captain while our national team was being embarrassed abroad.

(08 loss in tests)It was a massive shock: Gambhir recalls Dhoni's 2012 selection policy for Australia series"It was a massive shock, I think it would have been a massive shock for any cricketer. I have not heard anyone be told in 2012 that they would never be a part of the 2015 World Cup. I always had the impression that if you keep scoring runs, age is a just a number," Gambhir told India Today.

- Yet, this is the same Dhoni who himself declared in 2016 that he would like to play the 2019 world cup.5. About 50% of the Indian squad was filled with players of CSK irrespective of their form.

It is a shame that Dhoni can't speak his mind: Jamie Alter6. Never losing his cool in an international match but arguing with the on-field umpire for a decision perceived to be against CSK - a reflection of his true allegiance ?RR vs CSK | No ball controversy: Angry MS Dhoni enters field as leg umpire overrules decision - WatchThese are only the major points available easily over the internet.

For details, maybe we will have to wait till a biography is out for Gambhir / Yuvraj !